Understanding VPN and Zero Trust Security Models
It is important to have complete knowledge of both the VPN and Zero Trust security models prior to making an informed decision. Every model plays a critical part in safeguarding network integrity, and the underlying methods significantly differ.
VPN: A Traditional Network Security Solution
The VPN is a massively adopted technology creating a secured, encrypted link between the user’s network and the user’s devices. It enables the employees to connect remotely to the internal network of the company as if they are present physically in the office. The VPNs are specifically designed for securely extending the internal network throughout the internet to ensure that the remote users are accessing the resources of the company more safely.
VPNs offer another layer of encryption as they are not foolproof. The primary limitations of VPNs lie in the dependency on permit-based securities. The VPNs assume that the user is connected through the VPN is reliability that means that the network’s security relies on the user’s device instead of the network. It would leave the companies at risk when the devices get compromised.
Zero Trust: A Modern Security Paradigm
Zero Trust is a highly recent approach. It assumes that no users, devices, or applications are automatically relied on while in or out of the network. Accessing the systems and the data that gets granted relies on a restricted process of verification. The Zero Trust model employs identity-based encryption, access-based controls, and constant monitoring, ensuring that authorized users access the key resources.
Unlike the other VPNs with Zero Trust, which needs constant authentication, indicating that after the user connects to this network, the identity gets verified continuously. The approach would dramatically minimize the scope for insider threats with external cyberattacks while access is granted after the multiple layers of verification are done.
While VPNs create a reliable connection between the network and the device, Zero Trust assumes that devices may already be compromised, leading to a more stringent and secure access model designed to combat evolving cyber threats effectively.
Key Differences Between VPN and Zero Trust
Network Security Approach
VPNs are generally based on the entire perimeter security, indicating that they are safeguarding the business’s network completely. After the user connects to the network through a VPN, they typically have access to different internal systems without any constant verification. Alternatively, Zero Trust often operates under the assumption that no device or user is trustworthy until proven otherwise. Each access request, whether in or out of the network, gets authenticated or verified.
Trust Levels and Access Control
The VPNs are typically designed around the entire concept of the “trusted” users, who often expose the network to risks if the attacker gains access to the credentials of the users. Zero Trust removes such assumptions by enforcing strict identity and policies to access management. The Continuous monitoring and less privileged access principles can aid in ensuring that the less required data gets accessible at any time.
Response to Modern Threats
VPNs often struggle to safeguard against highly advanced threats, as once users connect, their access to the network becomes open. However, Zero Trust responds to modern threats with highly adaptive and dynamic security measures. It includes automatically adjusting access permissions based on real-time user behavior and the security context.
User Experience
At times, VPNs create a less-than-perfect user experience due to the requirement for a manual connection and slowdowns in the connection speed. Zero Trust often aims to reduce such disruptions using highly seamless methods of authentication and authorization like multi-factor authentication (MFA) and single sign-on (SSO), making secure access highly convenient.
Scalability
While organizations are facing constant growth and adapting to cloud-based solutions, VPNs take a lot of work to scale. The management of VPN access throughout the larger distributed workforce becomes complete, increasing the impact of performances. However, Zero Trust is inherently more scalable across cloud spaces while it does not depend on the central network perimeter.
How to Choose the Right Security Model for Your Organization
Choose a VPN or a Zero Trust as an organizational security model after seriously considering its specific needs, size, and resources. An in-depth security analysis of the vendors may be highly useful in determining an appropriate solution to meet any current or future requirements of security. The following are some pertinent considerations:
Evaluate Your Organization’s Size and Remote Work Needs
A VPN is enough for smaller businesses or those with fewer remote work needs. VPNs are considerably easier to deploy and affordable for smaller teams. But when companies have a bigger, distributed workforce or rely heavily on cloud applications with the Zero Trust model, a VPN is highly appropriate.
Assess Your Current Security Infrastructure
Companies with existing perimeter-based security systems often find it seamless to integrate the VPN, mainly when it has reliable firewalls with endpoint protection. When the infrastructure shifts towards the cloud-based solutions to implement the Zero Trust which is the natural evolution.
Consider Long-Term Security Goals
Zero Trust is actually a good investment in future-proof security. Its adaptive and proactive approach makes zero trust excellent for organizations that need sensitive data secured and defended from both inside and outside threats. In a business that values long-term growth and sustainability, investments in zero trust will keep you moving forward in preparing against the evolving nature of cyber threats.
Risk Tolerance
If it really matters to the organization, then it should be about how much risk the organization is willing to take. If security is at the top and you are ready to spend more money to monitor constantly and have very strict access control, Zero Trust is probably the better choice. Organizations that prefer simpler and cheaper measures over advanced security measures might be comfortable using just VPNs.
Vendor Security Assessment
Prior to a decision to adopt either VPN or Zero Trust, a vendor security assessment must be performed. A vendor security assessment is a process whereby potential risks are identified and ascertained that the chosen solution is integrated into the vendor’s security framework. Verify that third-party vendors meet the security standards your organization requires and that they are in compliance with industry regulations. Conducting a comprehensive assessment will further ensure the chosen model provides security controls and scalability unique to your organization’s needs.
Explore our Third-Party Risk Assessment: Book free Demo!
Book a demo
User Experience and Ease of Adoption
The final area of consideration relates to user experience and how your organization can easily transition into a new security model. While VPNs may require less up-front configuration, they can be more frictional for users as they attempt to connect to networks, especially when the VPN connections are slow or unmanageable, which can prove to drag down productivity, particularly in a remote work environment. Zero Trust, although difficult to implement, is fairly seamless once deployed for the users. It, therefore, often partners with SSO and Multi-Factor Authentication solutions that are easy and intuitive in giving secure access.
Cost Considerations
Cost is also an important factor to consider when evaluating security products. VPNs are more cost-effective when trying to get started with them; however, hidden costs present themselves as your organization grows. It might call for more infrastructure investment and management complexity and even possible vulnerabilities to security. These kinds of costs add up over the long haul, especially as remote workforces grow and the need for security becomes too large for the organization. Although the Zero Trust networks cost much at the implementation point, with reduced probabilities of a data breach and the blow from a cyber attack, it can end up costing much less in the long run.
